The Al Ain court threatening message case shows how the UAE treats digital threats seriously. A civil court ordered a man to pay Dh3,000 in moral damages after he sent a threatening message to a woman.
The woman filed a civil suit asking for Dh60,000 in compensation. She claimed the message caused emotional suffering, including anxiety, stress, and fear. After reviewing the situation, the court decided on a lower amount based on the nature and impact of the threat.
Earlier, a criminal court had already handled the matter. The Al Ain Appeals Prosecution had convicted the man for sending the threat through an IT platform and issued a fine. The civil court later upheld that ruling and confirmed the legal fault.
The judgment called the message a “verbal warning with a promise of harm.” It did not include any actual plan or method of execution. The court said the threat caused no physical danger but did result in mental stress.
The judge ruled that the impact was limited to emotional discomfort. The woman experienced psychological distress, but there was no evidence of long-term mental harm. This finding led the court to award Dh3,000, a sum it found appropriate given the limited scope of harm.
The ruling highlights the UAE’s firm position on cyber threats and verbal abuse. Digital behavior falls under strict laws, and online threats can bring criminal charges or civil penalties. The court reinforced that any digital message with harmful intent can lead to legal action.
According to Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021, electronic threats are punishable even if they do not involve physical violence. This case aligns with the UAE’s goal of protecting emotional safety and enforcing accountability online.
The Al Ain court threatening message case sends a clear message to the public. Even if a threat does not result in physical harm, it can still lead to serious legal consequences. The law recognizes emotional well-being as a protected right.
The woman had hoped for Dh60,000 in damages. However, the court found the threat did not reach that level of severity. There were no signs of physical harm or repeated psychological trauma. As a result, the court awarded a smaller, symbolic amount.
This ruling confirms that verbal threats, even without action, can lead to both criminal and civil punishment. The UAE courts continue to prioritize safety and dignity, both offline and online. The Al Ain court threatening message verdict reinforces that principle with clarity.
